-->

Welcome to our Coding with python Page!!! hier you find various code with PHP, Python, AI, Cyber, etc ... Electricity, Energy, Nuclear Power

Saturday, 31 October 2020

How to strongly type jest mocks

#typescript, #jestjs, #typescript-typings, #ts-jest, 


To strongly type my jest mocks. To a certain extent, I can make it work.

When I use mocks (the way I currently do) the return type is of the original type but when I have to access any method added by Jest I have to typecast it so jest.Mock to access a method. 

 I've tried to work with jest.Mockjest.Mockedjest.MockInstance.


class MyTest {
    constructor(private readonly msg: string) {}

    public foo(): string {
        return this.msg;
    }
}

const myTestMock: jest.Mock<MyTest, [string]> = jest.fn<MyTest, [string]>(() => ({
    msg: 'private',
    foo: jest.fn().mockReturnValue('aaa'),
}));
// Results in error:
// Type '{ msg: string; foo: Mock<any, any>; }' is not assignable to type 'MyTest'.
// Property 'msg' is private in type 'MyTest' but not in type '{ msg: string; foo: Mock<any, any>; }'

const myTestMockInstance: MyTest = new myTestMock('a');
console.log(myTestMockInstance.foo()); // --> aaa

// Accessing jest mock methods:
(<jest.Mock>myTestMockInstance).mockClear(); // <-- can this be done without type casting

Dirty workaround:

const myTestMock: jest.Mock<MyTest, [string]> = jest.fn<MyTest, [string]>(
    // Cast to any to satisfy TS
    (): any => ({
        msg: 'private',
        foo: jest.fn().mockReturnValue('aaa'),
    })
);
xxxxxxxxxx

  1. There is a helper which makes types: look ts-jest

  2. usually you should test public interface, not an implementation. Instead of testing private methods you could extract that logic to a public interface (maybe to another class that provides the interface)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments

Rank

seo